Since 2020, we have lived in a world where sport and outdoor activity have taken a predominant place in our lifestyles. Alongside this growth, we are seeing an increase in the supply of sports equipment, particularly sneakers designed for the outdoors. But then why are outdoor sneakers that allow us to be as close as possible to living things so destructive for the latter?

Let's explore why most outdoor sneakers can be considered environmentally destructive.

Synthetic Materials

The plastic problem

The first factor that contributes to the environmental impact of outdoor shoes is the material composition. Many of these shoes are made from synthetic materials, often derived from petroleum, which are neither recyclable nor recycled. Although strong and lightweight, the plastic used is not biodegradable and can take hundreds of years to decompose.

Examples

Several outdoor giants stand out, so Salomon, for example, is famous for its high-quality shoes, designed to withstand the most difficult conditions. However, the durability of these shoes is mainly due to the use of plastics and other non-biodegradable materials. Other brands like Nike and Adidas are also following this dangerous trend.

Production and transportation

CO2 emissions

The production of sneakers also requires a significant amount of energy, often from non-renewable sources. CO2 emissions during the production and transport process are therefore considerable.

Example of global production chains

Many big brands have their shoes made in Asia, where production costs are lower. However, this often raises ethical questions regarding working conditions. Factories with questionable safety standards and insufficient wages are common in these production lines .

Diverse examples

Nike and Adidas have been criticized for their labor practices in countries like Vietnam and Indonesia.

Salomon, although less publicized, also uses production lines in Asia, raising similar questions.

Transport and CO2 Emissions

The impact of global transportation

With production lines established primarily in Asia, transporting these products to markets like Europe and the United States generates a considerable amount of CO2 emissions.

The Culture of Consumption

Limited lifespan

Another harmful aspect is the limited lifespan of these products. The culture of “fast fashion” and planned obsolescence encourage the frequent renewal of equipment, which increases demand and, therefore, production.

Sustainable alternatives overshadowed

Some brands like us are trying to introduce more sustainable and respectful alternatives to life.

Conclusion

Although outdoor sneakers are valued for their performance and comfort, it is imperative to consider the environmental and social impacts associated with their production. Working conditions in Asia, CO2 emissions from global transportation, and an unsustainable consumer culture are aspects that can no longer be ignored. Brands, as well as consumers, must take steps to mitigate these impacts and opt for more sustainable practices